At a recent Brainzooming client creative thinking session, the company’s Chief Operating Officer told a story about seeing a car with both an anti-corporation bumper sticker and an Apple logo on it. His point was how interesting it is that Apple had transcended being a huge, very profitable corporation by the car owner.
His story made me blurt out, “Did you hear about the Harvard Business Review journalist who wrote a very thorough comparison between the innovation styles of Steve Jobs and the management team at Sunkist?
“He was widely criticized for comparing Apple and oranges!”
Feel free to insert your guffaws here! When we get brains zooming (even our own), who knows what types of connections will be made?
Comparing Apples and Oranges
“Comparing apples and oranges” ranks with “think outside the box” as one of my least favorite business jargon phrases. “Comparing apples and oranges” is typically used by a strategic dolt to shut down creative thinking and obscure connections that may very naturally exist between two or more things.
Apples and oranges actually have MANY things in common. Even though they aren’t identical on the surface, there are multiple strategic and creative comparisons to be made about their similarities and differences.
In fact, considering ways of comparing apples and oranges can help your creative thinking skills. Next time a strategic dolt tries to get in the way of your creative thinking by saying you’re comparing apples and oranges, remember these ways the two fruits (or anything you’re examining that may seem unrelated) can be compared:
1. Apples and oranges move through comparable PROCESSES
The supply chain bringing apples and oranges together at a grocery store or fruit stand for sale is obviously a point of comparison. When you’re comparing potentially disparate things, look for comparable processes they each experience.
2. Apples and oranges are SUBSTITUTES for one another
Since both apples and oranges satisfy the need for food, in general, and fruit, specifically, they serve as potential SUBSTITUTES for one another. As you look at potentially dissimilar items, consider how they might meet the same or related needs.
3. Apples and oranges can be made MORE SIMILAR
You can manipulate apples and oranges for greater similarity (i.e., by cutting them into similarly-sized pieces, or putting them into recipes as ingredients). When making a comparison others think is a stretch, transform the two things to accentuate their similarities strategically, numerically, chronologically, or in other ways.
4. Compare the REASONS FOR DIFFERENCES between apples and oranges
You can explore the reasons apples and oranges are or are not appropriate for comparison and make comparisons about that! Similarly, when comparing two things others think don’t match up, dive into why they appear to be different, whether because of strategic direction, motivation, nature/nurture, etc.
5. Acknowledge the differences and COMPARE THEM ANYWAY
Maybe apples and oranges are all you have to analyze. In that case, to better understand them, comparing and contrasting the differences is your only option. Being able to compare things to provide context and contrast is vital to analysis. When others lack the creative thinking skills to see the similarities in two things you’re analyzing, turn it around and simply compare differences.
6. Make a FANCIFUL COMPARISON between apples and oranges
Many strategic business conversations have an air of seriousness and a resistance to anything not grounded in reality. Don’t let that stop you. If people shut down more realistic comparisons as inappropriate, get crazy on them with a really outlandish comparison. The conversation you’ll stimulate will likely yield the greatest creative value.
7. Even if apples and orange were completely unrelated, RANDOM ITEMS trigger creative ideas
Pick any two things that really ARE completely unrelated. Looking for the comparisons and contrasts between them will get peoples’ minds working on new paths, sparking creative ideas. What will those creative ideas be? It’s tough (maybe impossible) to imagine in advance what a particular group will come up with creatively when considering random inputs, but be prepared for dramatically new thinking
Seven Apples and Oranges Comparisons for Creative Thinking
There you have it. Seven ways to consider comparing apples and oranges (or other things perceived to be dissimilar) to counter a strategic dolt trying to squash creative thinking. Simply remember you can push a strategic comparison based on:
- Process similarities
- A potential substitute realtionship
- Changes to accentuate similarities
- The reasons for underlying differences
- Comparing elements that shouldn’t be compared
- Fanciful similarities
- Completely random connections
So when was the last time YOU were accused of comparing apples and oranges? I’ll bet now you can’t wait for the next time it happens! – Mike Brown
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to the free Brainzooming blog email updates.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Founder of The Brainzooming Group, and an expert on strategy, creativity, and innovation. Mike is a frequent speaker on innovation, strategic thinking, and social media.
More Posts - Website
The phrase "comparing apples and oranges" is often invoked when a person compares two items that are thought to be so different as to make any comparison invalid. But are apples and oranges really that different? According to TimeTree.org, Malus x domestica (the apple) and Citrus sinensis (the navel orange) are separated by about 89.2 million years of evolution, but they are both fruit trees. Surely there are valid comparisons that can be made. So where are the differences, and is a comparison between them truly invalid, as the idiom says?
To make my comparisons, I will draw from my own experience and several online sources, including a dietician's analysis of the juices of the two fruits and a published study: "Comparing apples and oranges: a randomised prospective study," by James Barone, which appeared in theBritish Medical Journal in 2000. Here are just a few characteristics:
|GROWN ON FRUIT TREE||Yes||Yes|
|COLOR OF FRUIT||Depends on variety||Orange|
|FRUIT SKIN TEXTURE||smooth||knobby|
|VISIBLE SEEDS IN FRUIT||Yes||Depends on variety|
|MEAN CIRCUMFERENCE OF FRUIT (cm)||25.6||24.4|
|MEAN DIAMETER OF FRUIT (cm)||7.9||7.6|
|MEAN WEIGHT OF FRUIT (g)||340||357|
|CAN BE EATEN||Yes||Yes|
|FIBER IN A LARGE FRUIT (g)||4.5||2.4|
|CAN BE JUICED||Yes||Yes|
|CALORIES (per 8 oz. serving juice)||117||112|
|POTASSIUM (mg, per 8 oz. serving juice)||295||496|
|VITAMIN C (mg, per 8 oz. serving juice)||103||124|
|FOLATE (mcg, per 8 oz. serving juice)||0||74|
As we can see from this small list, it is quite easy to compare apples and oranges. And they are remarkably similar in many ways. Although they may look and feel very different, the two fruits have a similar size and weight, and their juices have a similar caloric content and levels of vitamin C. However, they differ widely in fiber content of the fruit and in the potassium and folate levels of their juices.
In an earlier study ("Apples and Oranges—A Comparison," published in the Annals of Improbable Research in 1995), Scott Sandford produced a spectrograph from dried samples of a Granny Smith apple and a Sunkist navel orange. He concluded that not only was it easy to compare the two, but the two fruits were remarkably similar. "Thus, it would appear that the comparing apples and oranges defense should no longer be considered valid. This is a somewhat startling revelation," Sanford wrote. "It can be anticipated to have a dramatic effect on the strategies used in arguments and discussions in the future." Well, he didn't get that right, but perhaps we should consider dropping the use of this idiom.
Like this article?
SIGN UP for our newsletter